![](\"https:\/\/cdn.images.express.co.uk\/img\/dynamic\/23\/590x\/secondary\/vodafone-o2-three-ee-legal-procdeedings-5105597.jpg?r=1702037255478\")
<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
Three of the four major mobile network providers have responded to the class action case launched against them for allegedly overcharging on millions of mobile phone contracts.<\/p>\n
The \u2018Loyalty Penalty Claim\u2019 proceedings, launched by consumer rights champion Justin Gutmann and the law firm Charles Lyndon, claim Vodafone, O2, Three and EE have overcharged on 28.2 million contracts and are seeking damages of at least \u00a33.285billion.<\/p>\n
If successful, someone who held a contract with just one of the mobile operators could receive as much as \u00a31,823.<\/p>\n
An O2\u00a0spokesperson said: “To date, there has been no contact with our legal team on this claim. However, we are proud to have been the first provider to have launched split contracts a decade ago which automatically and fully reduce customers\u2019 bills once they\u2019ve paid off their handset.<\/p>\n
“We\u2019ve long been calling for an end to the ‘smartphone swindle’ and for other mobile operators to stop the pernicious practice of charging their customers for phones they already own.”<\/p>\n
READ MORE: <\/strong> Melton Building Society launches four ISA products paying up to 4.95% interest<\/strong><\/p>\n A Vodafone\u00a0spokesperson said: \u201cThis has just been brought to our attention and we don\u2019t yet have sufficient detail for our legal team to assess.\u201d<\/p>\n An EE spokesperson said: \u201cWe strongly disagree with the speculative claim being brought against us. EE offers a range of tariffs and a robust process for dealing with end-of-contract notifications. The UK mobile market is a highly competitive space with some of the lowest pricing across Europe.\u201d<\/p>\n Express.co.uk approached\u00a0Three\u00a0but the mobile network provider did not comment.<\/p>\n The so-called \u2019Loyalty Penalty\u2019 claim is being brought on behalf of consumers who have purchased mobile contracts made up of a mobile phone and airtime services such as data, minutes and calls.<\/p>\n When these contracts are agreed upon, their price during the minimum term of the contract includes both the mobile and the use of airtime services.<\/p>\n Don’t miss… <\/strong> The claim alleges that the mobile network operators failed to reduce the amount charged once the minimum contractual term expired, even though consumers had already paid for their mobiles.<\/p>\n This resulted in existing customers being charged more than a new customer would be if they were just paying for airtime services.<\/p>\n Justin Gutmann, the former head of research and insight at Citizens Advice said: \u201cI\u2019m launching this class action because I believe these four mobile phone companies have systematically exploited millions of loyal customers across the UK through loyalty penalties \u2013 taking over \u00a33billion out of the pockets of hard-working people and their families.\u201d<\/p>\n Most customers of the four mobile network operators who made payments after the expiry of their contractual minimum term are included in the Loyalty Penalty Claim, which is being conducted on an \u201copt-out\u201d basis.<\/p>\n![](\"https:\/\/cdn.images.express.co.uk\/img\/dynamic\/23\/590x\/secondary\/overcharged-mobile-phone-contracts-loyalty-penalty-claim-5105612.jpg?r=1702037255535\")
<\/p>\n
Vodafone, EE, Three and O2 face \u00a33bn claim over ‘loyalty penalties'[INSIGHT] <\/strong>
Christmas essentials cheaper this year than last include sparkling wine[ANALYSIS] <\/strong>
Britons can slash energy bills \u2018more\u2019 with Uswitch scheme – and get extra \u00a310[EXPLAINED] <\/strong><\/p>\n\n