Boris Johnson’s fury at Nick Clegg’s mansion tax plans revealed: ‘He can’t be serious!’

In February, Prime Minister Boris Johnson was reportedly considering introducing a mansion tax for high value homes. According to the Telegraph, the measure was being examined as a way of helping pay for large scale infrastructure improvements, primarily in the north of England. Two sources close to Number 10 suggested the Prime Minister and Chancellor Sajid Javid were looking for ways “to raise more tax from better off homeowners” and that the mansion tax had been discussed by the Treasury and Number 10.

The plans appear to have since been dropped, though, as the fact an idea originally floated by the Lib Dems and Labour was being discussed by the Government infuriated many Tory activists.

Almost exactly eight years ago, it was then-Lib Dem leader Nick Clegg who pledged to introduce a mansion tax on high value properties while in coalition with former Prime Minister David Cameron.

The policy was incredibly controversial and was seen as contributing to the Lib Dem’s defeat at the 2015 General Election.

And Mr Johnson, who at the time was Mayor of London, showed fierce opposition to the plans.

He told The Telegraph in 2012: “I like Nick Clegg but he can’t be serious. These proposals are a non-starter.

“He knows it. I know it. The idea of a mansion tax is crazy.

“The idea of a mansion tax by the back door through vastly inflated council tax bills is nonsense.

“These taxes will disproportionately hit London and Londoners, penalising people simply because of circumstance, trapping people who in many cases are cash poor.

“London is the motor of the UK economy; kicking it hard makes no sense at all.”

Internal research carried out by the Conservative Party suggested that one million homeowners would have had to have their properties reassessed under the plans.

Moreover, according to a 2013 report by The Telegraph, both Labour and the Lib Dems got the sums completely wrong, as applying a 1pc annual tax on properties worth over £2million would have not raised the money claimed by both parties.

The Lib Dems first proposed the controversial tax – which would have applied primarily to Londoners and owners of historic properties – and then Labour followed.

Both proposed an annual “asset tax” of 1pc of the value of a property above the £2mllion threshold.

JUST IN: Real reason Asia made success of 2008 financial crash revealed

By the Lib Dem’s calculations this would have brought in £1.7billionn per year or, by Labour’s reckoning, a higher £2billion.

Knight Frank, the upmarket estate agent, combed the data from HM Revenue & Customs and Land Registry to discover the numbers of properties currently within the net and their likely value.

It estimated the number at 50,000 but said “figures of between 35,000 and 74,000 have been variously put forward”.

It was also difficult to discover the average value of a £2million-plus house, Knight Frank found, as official data was contradictory in some respects and incomplete.

By its calculations the average value was £4.4million.

Based on these figures it reckoned after exempted properties were taken out of the equation, the tax would have raised £1.3bn per year – a shortfall on parties’ expectations.

In order to reach the Lib Dem’s target of £1.7billion, Knight Frank calculated that the threshold would have had to drop to £1.25million.

Macron’s support for Boris Johnson’s bridge from UK to France exposed [INSIGHT]
Prince Philip’s warning to bankers over financial crash revealed [REVEALED]
Rishi Sunak warning: Why Chancellor is poised for ‘biggest test’ [EXCLUSIVE]

Even if dropped to that level, the revenues would have only totalled £1.9billionn, it found, suggesting Labour’s sums were wildly over-optimistic.

Jonathan Harris, director of mortgage broker Anderson Harris, said: “The problem with this pernicious and grossly unfair tax is that it wouldn’t just hit just the wealthy in their mansions and swanky apartments but also homeowners living in relatively modest family homes who have benefited from house-price rises over the years. Many of these will be older homeowners who have all their worth tied up in their property and who would therefore struggle to pay anything like the £2,000-a-month average mansion tax.

“The only option for many would be to sell up and trade down to a smaller property – quite a wrench when you consider that this is the family home they may have lived in for many years.”

Naomi Heaton of property fund manager London Central Portfolio said: “If the Government or opposition parties feel the wealthy are not paying enough tax, they should find fairer ways of raising revenue.

“This tax does not take into account someone’s mortgage, for example.

“You cannot tax a family by simply looking at the value of the house they have chosen to live in.”

Source: Read Full Article