The Trump administration’s withdrawal of curbs on methane emissions from oil wells and related equipment threatens to disadvantage U.S. energy producers touting natural gas as a green alternative to coal.
The final rules, unveiled Thursday byEnvironmental Protection Agency Administrator Andrew Wheeler in Pittsburgh, may provoke a backlash in Europe, where regulators are developing a methane strategy and eyeing tougher scrutiny of the carbon footprint of energy imports.
$69.9B Renewable power investment worldwide in Q2 2020
50,820 Million metric tons of greenhouse emissions, most recent annual data 45% Carbon-free net power in Germany, most recent data
Jakarta, IndonesiaMost polluted air today, in sensor range 0 3 2 1 0 9 ,0 8 7 6 5 4 0 7 6 5 4 3 0 6 5 4 3 2 Soccer pitches of forest lost this hour, most recent data
“For EPA to eliminate methane regulation makes a commercially risky situation even worse for U.S. producers and exporters,” said Ben Ratner, a senior director with theEnvironmental Defense Fund. “With the EU primed to tighten the screws on leaky gas, the Trump EPA’s methane rollbacks aren’t just bad climate policy, they’re bad geopolitics and a competitive disadvantage for U.S. gas.”
The final measures end methane-specific limits at new oil and gas wells while removing additional curbs on leaks of smog-causing volatile organic compounds from gas transmission and storage equipment. The initiative also effectively preempts a legal requirement for the government to restrict emissions of both types of pollution from nearly a million existing wells — a scenario oil producers have warned could force them to stop operating some old and low-yield wells.
“This is especially important to smaller energy operators who are the backbone of the energy industry in this country,” Wheeler said Thursday.
Environmentalists who’ve vowed to challenge the rules in court said the administration was making a dangerous move to unleash a powerful greenhouse gas despite a narrow window of time to avert the most catastrophic consequences of climate change.
“The Trump EPA is giving the oil and gas industry a green light to keep leaking enormous amounts of climate pollution into the air,” said David Doniger, senior strategic director of climate and clean energy at the Natural Resources Defense Council. “We cannot protect the health of our children and grandchildren, especially in the most polluted and endangered communities, if EPA lets this industry off scot-free.”
Methane, the chief component of natural gas, is a valuable energy source and commodity in its own right. Yet it’s also a powerful heat-trapping pollutant that can exacerbate climate change when it escapes from oil wells or gas pipelines. It represents about a 10th of U.S. greenhouse gas emissions, and is estimated to be 84 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the atmosphere over a 20-year period.
The EPA is largely retaining regulations aimed at curtailing releases of volatile organic compounds from new and modified oil and gas wells. The agency and some industry advocates say that those curbs effectively capture methane too, rendering specific requirements on the greenhouse gas unnecessary.
“EPA’s commitment to following the Clean Air Act protects health and the environment, effectively regulates emissions from our industry, and allows for the responsible production of oil and gas,” said Anne Bradbury, chief executive of theAmerican Exploration and Production Council.
The oil industry is fractured over the Trump administration maneuver, which was opposed by large, integrated energy companies such asRoyal Dutch Shell Plc andBP Plc that have highlighted sustainability goals and voluntarily adopted methane-reduction targets.
Direct methane regulation is necessary to protect the industry’s license to operate, BP argued in anopinion piece last year.
“When used in electricity generation, natural gas has less than half the carbon dioxide emissions of coal, and it also can be a vital backup to renewables,” former BP America President Susan Dio wrote. “But to maximize the climate benefits of gas — and meet the dual challenge of producing more energy with fewer emissions — we need to address its Achilles’ heel and eliminate methane emissions.”
Shell U.S. President Gretchen Watkins called the EPA’s decision “frustrating and disappointing,” given clear “negative impacts of leaks and fugitive emissions.”
Energy analysts predicted the Trump administration’s move may prompt regulators in New Mexico and other states to write more stringent rules clamping down on methane emissions.
Officials in both Europe and U.S. states could embrace “more rigid regulatory protocols to compensate for a continuing U.S. federal deregulatory posture,” ClearView Energy Partners said in a research note to clients.
The Trump administration’s retreat on methane comes as the president courts oil and gas industry voters in Pennsylvania and Texas, two must-win states for him in November.
It’s not clear whether the approach will have widespread appeal, though.Polling released by the NRDC showed 75% of respondents — both Republicans and Democrats — support strengthening federal standards to restrict the intentional release of methane from wells and require companies to repair leaks.
The administration’s pivot is also vulnerable to reversal. If Democrat Joe Biden wins election, his administration would have several avenues, from a potential congressional repeal of the methane rule to settling litigation over it, to make good on his promise of “aggressive methane pollution limits for new and existing oil and gas operations.”
Source: Read Full Article